The European parliament discussed the Regulation of Mercury and came to an agreement that states that dental professionals are not allowed to use amalgam for pregnant or breastfeeding women, children under the age of 15 years or in deciduous teeth, except when deemed strictly necessary. These requirements have been agreed on to reduce the release of mercury into the environment.
Therefore, dental professionals need to find a good alternative for amalgam.
Which alternatives do you have?
To face the fact, it is not difficult to find an alternative for amalgam. The difficulty is to find a GOOD alternative that fits the needs of yours patient’ case.
To make things easy we at GC, believe you can find a valuable alternative for amalgam within 3 product groups. It just depends on the specifics of your case which product group offers you the perfect solution.
So, which criteria do you need to keep into account?
Aesthetic, biomimetic, strong and practical... With these properties, EQUIA Forte HT provides more effective treatment options for patients with deep carious lesions in my clinical practice - without any sensitivity.Dr Zeynep Bilge KütükTurkey
G-ænial Universal Injectable is the material of choice for all restorative indications. On top of being very easy to control, it has an exceptional strength and a perfect blending with the natural tooth tissues.Dr Ahmed Al-JaffIraq
Flowable, easy to use and biomimetic, everX Flow is a unique restorative material able to emulate both dentin and dentino-enamel junction (DEJ) by providing the elasticity and toughness of dentin and the unique stress-breaking property of the DEJ.Dr Mark FraterHungary
1. Gurgan et al. 8-Year Clinical Evaluation of a Glass Ionomer Restorative System. J Dent Res. 2017;96 Spec Issue B: #0287CED.
2. Gurgan et al. Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: a 6-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(7):2335-2343.
EQUIA vs. composite
3. Türkün et al. A Prospective Six-Year Clinical Study Evaluating Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cements with Resin Coating on Posterior Teeth:
Quo Vadis? Oper Dent. 2016;41(6):587-598.
EQUIA vs. Riva Self Cure
4. Basso et al. 7 Years, Multicentre, Clinical Evaluation on 154 Permanent Restorations Made With a Glassionomer-based Restorative
System. J Dent Res. 2016;95 Spec Issue B: #0446.
5. Klinke T. et al. Clinical performance during 48 months of two current glass ionomer restorative systems with coatings: a randomized
clinical trial in the field. Trials. 2016;17(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1339-8.
EQUIA vs. glass ionomer with conventional coating
6. Gurgan et al. 12-month Clinical-performance of a Glass-hybrid-restorative in Non-caries-cervical-lesions of Patients With Bruxism J Dent
Res. 2018;97 Spec Issue A: #0235.
EQUIA Forte vs. composite